Breaking

Taj Mahal or ‘Tejo Mahalaya’? The legal tussle explained

In 2017, the Archaeological Survey of India stated unambiguously that the Taj was a 17th-century tomb. The technology used in its construction and design, including pietra dura, did not exist in pre-medieval days. It should have ended any vestiges of controversy.

· 7/17/2026, 9:47:30 AM· 2 min read
Taj Mahal or ‘Tejo Mahalaya’? The legal tussle explained
In 2017, the Archaeological Survey of India stated unambiguously that the Taj was a 17th-century tomb. The technology used in its construction and design, including pietra dura, did not exist in pre-medieval days. It should have ended any vestiges of controversy.
Read original story

Related stories